Linking revenue growth to headcount increase not correct
By
siliconindia news bureau
New Delhi:The conventional offshoring equation of linking revenue growth to headcount increase will not be a correct method of gauging an IT firm's progress, says a Forrester report. Many IT firms will shed up to 30 percent of their non-strategic current clients to pursue a more specialized strategy and rebuild competitiveness.
The report also warns financial analysts who continue to use outdated metrics such as, number of people added in the quarter as a measure of growth, as this actually encourages a 'body shopping' mindset in the tier II suppliers.
To meet stock market expectations, these firms continue picking up customer business all over the map in terms of skills, service lines, and industries served-ultimately lacking specialization or niche play.
Sudin Apte, senior analyst and author of the report said: "Polarisation between the offshore providers in India has accelerated. India's top three providers-Infosys, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), and Wipro-now drive almost half of India's total IT services exports by value."
The report titled "Surviving The Offshore Vendor Polarisation Puzzle" by Forrester states that many of these providers have added a huge army of new recruits in the past two years but unlike the top three players, these firms fail to grow revenue in proportion to the increase in headcount.
Cognizant, HCL, and Satyam still hold their ground and continue to grow, most non-specialized and undifferentiated tier II and tier III firms stand to lose because margin pressures do not allow them to invest enough in building specialization or take proactive initiatives to help clients ramp up.
The report predicts that in an all-out survival attempt, these firms will initiate a strategy overhaul and take steps such as divorcing non-strategic clients or shifting from a pure services play to an IP or solution accelerator proposition.
Apte cautions the financial analyst community tracking IT firms that they can no more rely on the conventional offshore equation; evidently linking revenue growth to the headcount growth.
The report also warns financial analysts who continue to use outdated metrics such as, number of people added in the quarter as a measure of growth, as this actually encourages a 'body shopping' mindset in the tier II suppliers.
To meet stock market expectations, these firms continue picking up customer business all over the map in terms of skills, service lines, and industries served-ultimately lacking specialization or niche play.
Sudin Apte, senior analyst and author of the report said: "Polarisation between the offshore providers in India has accelerated. India's top three providers-Infosys, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), and Wipro-now drive almost half of India's total IT services exports by value."
The report titled "Surviving The Offshore Vendor Polarisation Puzzle" by Forrester states that many of these providers have added a huge army of new recruits in the past two years but unlike the top three players, these firms fail to grow revenue in proportion to the increase in headcount.
Cognizant, HCL, and Satyam still hold their ground and continue to grow, most non-specialized and undifferentiated tier II and tier III firms stand to lose because margin pressures do not allow them to invest enough in building specialization or take proactive initiatives to help clients ramp up.
The report predicts that in an all-out survival attempt, these firms will initiate a strategy overhaul and take steps such as divorcing non-strategic clients or shifting from a pure services play to an IP or solution accelerator proposition.
Apte cautions the financial analyst community tracking IT firms that they can no more rely on the conventional offshore equation; evidently linking revenue growth to the headcount growth.
Reader's comments(3)
1
I neither support nor withdraw from Forrester's analysis. Until recently, for
any team or company, headcount was a measure of growth, and obvious reason
being, more the headcount, more are the man hours available for delivery. There
is a cause why a company would scale up the headcount, from my experiences as a
part of strategy teams, I understand that its delivery requirement driven rather
than just numbers. It would still be a practice in teams and startups to measure
growth with the headcount increase !
any team or company, headcount was a measure of growth, and obvious reason
being, more the headcount, more are the man hours available for delivery. There
is a cause why a company would scale up the headcount, from my experiences as a
part of strategy teams, I understand that its delivery requirement driven rather
than just numbers. It would still be a practice in teams and startups to measure
growth with the headcount increase !
Posted by:
Abhi
2
changes are the only thing constant.. so go ahead , it is a part of the flow.
Posted by:
divya
3
of course they need to shift their strategy. Hope these strategies will work.
Posted by:
Suhan
- Terror puts India among 20 most dangerous places
- Expatriate CEOs still feel safe in Mumbai
- Deccan Mujahideen email threatens Delhi
- UK's work-permit norms to affect Indian IT staff
- Expatriate CEOs still feel safe in Mumbai
- Inflation will moderate: Chidambaram
- Karnataka firms seek licence for modern weapons
- Taj hotel premises handed back to Tata group
- Air India cuts fares on all domestic routes
- Inflation will moderate: Chidambaram
- Terror puts India among 20 most dangerous places
- Mumbai terror: IT clients cancel Bangalore visits
- 'Terrorists have no religion; politicians, act responsibly'
- 'Mumbai terror strikes meant to hit Indian economy'
- Online social media comes alive during Mumbai attacks
- MNCs pay more to Indian staff
- Future CEOs may emerge from HR departments
- 'IT industry raised India's international image'
- Former PM V.P. Singh, the Mandal messiah, dies
- Bad bosses can give heart attacks to men




